Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Consequences of Unrestricted Web Publishing


When thinking about the impact that unrestricted web publishing has on the dissemination of information, I immediately think of social networking. Social media gives people from all different ages and backgrounds full access to post whatever they want whenever they want. Even though many social network sites have their restrictions, these usually don’t take effect until the damage has been done. For example, Instagram may delete an account for posting inappropriate pictures. Even though the account was eventually deleted, the pictures were still posted, seen, and passed on to others. What if something was posted that wasn’t true? What are the consequences then? Since social media is so fast-paced, false information catches on like wildfire and just spreads. While reading The New York Times, I came across an article called, “After Prank by Dutch Girl on Twitter, Real Trouble.” The article is about a 14 year old Dutch girl who impersonated a Middle Eastern terrorist via Twitter this past Sunday. She sent a threat as a joke to American Airlines and quickly learned that this has serious repercussions.

Evaluating Source Credibility
The article was written by Dan Bilefsky. I clicked on his name and was able to see his other articles. He had 668 articles on the website and also writes for The International Herald Tribune. I looked it up and it was founded in France around 1887.  Bilefsky writes many international stories and seems to be an expert in this area. This made me feel confident that Bilefsky was credible and an experienced writer since The New York Times, a very established print and online newspaper, trusted him to write so many stories.

The next source is Twitter. Anytime I read an article about something that happened on Facebook or Twitter, I always go and check it out. Bilefsky (2014) stated that the girl’s Twitter account is under the name Sarah and that her Twitter handle is @QueenDemetriax_. I immediately looked this up and sure enough there were hundreds of tweets, retweets, and mentions regarding the situation with this name. However, the account is no longer up and American Airlines deleted their tweet stating that they sent her information to the FBI as a response to the threat.

In the article, Bilefsky (2014) stated that Sarah was supposed to be arrested by the Rotterdam Police. However, it does not state where Rotterdam is located. This is very confusing because the article says Paris in the beginning. I am not big on geography and had to use Google in order to find out that Rotterdam is a city in the Netherlands. To confirm the arrest, I did a little research and was able to find the Rotterdam Police Twitter account where they tweeted below.
Bilefsky (2014) stated, “Tinet de Jonge, a spokeswoman for the department, said by phone that the girl had been released Monday but remained a suspect, pending an investigation” (para. 6). This leads me to believe that Bilefsky was able to speak with her by phone to get more information or that he saw this information somewhere else. Sources from government organizations or businesses are typically good because they are experts in their field. However, I visited the Rotterdam Police website, translated it, and found a list of their spokespersons for media and de Jonge was not listed. Many other articles also quoted her as a spokeswoman for the department. I am unsure as to why she is not listed on the website.

The article also used Mark Miller, a spokesman from American Airlines and Sarah’s father as secondary sources. A family member as a source is not as effective in this situation because their statements can be biased since they do not want to see their loved ones in trouble.

Bilefsky writes in an objective tone and doesn't state his opinion on the matter. All the links in the article work and back up what he claims. The article also states that an Esther de Jong contributed to the story from Amsterdam.  There are no links or information regarding her other than this, so there is no way for a reader to tell how much she contributed and if de Jong is a credible source or not.

Impact of Sarah’s Unrestricted Publishing
This article is the perfect example of the impact that unrestricted web publishing can have on the masses. This story went viral and quickly became a global issue. Many people are still dealing with the pain from 9/11 and now this incident happened right at the April 15 anniversary of the Boston Marathon bombing. This caused a huge upset not only with Americans, but many people around the world. Several tweets surfaced about racism and terrorism.

Teens see social media as a casual landscape where they have the freedom to say and post whatever is on their mind. Many teens do not realize the consequences of their actions and it’s our duty as parents and adults to teach adolescents about the restrictions regarding their online use. As of today at 4:30 p.m., Bilefsky's article had about 94 comments.  Many people like Rachael Harralson from California stood up for Sarah saying, “It was appropriate for American Airlines to take this seriously - until they understood the situation. To now continue treat it as a real threat and prosecute this girl is wrong.” Others were harsher, saying she was stupid, greedy, and enjoyed attention. Regardless of the intention, no one online should just assume something is true or false without doing the proper research and investigation. Unfortunately, the article stated that the impact continues as the airline began to receive several copycat threats following the incident.  

The story was covered by several news outlets such as USA Today, Washington Post, NBC news, LA Times, and UK’s Dailymail. Overall, the article did have some questionable pieces but I still say it was for the most part accurate.

Bilefsky, D. (2014). After prank by Dutch girl on Twitter, real trouble. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/16/world/europe/dutch-girl-twitter-threat.html?hp

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Social Media and Truth

I think that social media sites are great tools for obtaining credible information, if used correctly. However, I have a hard time using Facebook for these purposes. For me, Facebook is somewhere I can go to catch up on my friends and family and not somewhere I catch up on news or good articles. I actually use LinkedIn and my Twitter feed for that.
Hamman, S. (2007, February 25). We can do it! Rosie the riveter. Retrieved from https://flic.kr/p/mQG6e2
I was on Twitter and an article by Elle Magazine entitled, “Scary New Research Says Most Job Listings Are Designed to Repel Women,” caught my eye for many reasons. First, I minored in Women Studies so these topics intrigue me. Second, the words in the title “scary” and “repel” are good attention-grabbers. Last, the subject matter seemed appropriate for me since I am going to grad school to change careers. I will eventually have to start searching and applying for jobs. In the article, Matthews (2014) states that there are certain words in job descriptions that turn women off as in “assertive”, “independent”, or “aggressive”. Other words as in “sociable”, “responsible”, and “dedicated” attract female applicants. The source used in this article was a study done by the Technische Universitat Munchen (TUM). Matthews (2014) explained that the researchers gave, “260 men and women differently worded postings for the same job to see how each gender reacted to the changes in the vocab” (para. 2). The results showed that the majority of women were “overwhelmingly” comfortable with the latter group and men did not seem to be affected by either word group.
Although I may not completely agree with the results based on my own attributes, I do believe it is true because I checked and it is a credible study. The only thing that would make the study better was being clear on where the test was done. TUM is located in Germany which means cultural factors may influence the results. The study states that it teamed up with researchers in New York City to do a test regarding leadership skills, but did not clarify the location for the job study test. Would they have received the same results in America or a different country? Our culture, economy, and society have a lot to do with who we are and where we are in our careers. The Pew Research Center analyzed U.S. Census data and found that about 40 percent of American homes include mothers who are the sole or primary breadwinner (Kim, 2013, para. 2). I, myself, am in a relationship where our gender roles just happen to be switched. My fiancĂ© loves to cook and I HATE it. He is the one that makes an amazing dinner for us every night. Instead, I love to work. I love having a challenging, yet rewarding career.  Even though many people in our society may not feel that the woman should be the breadwinner of the relationship or even the primary financial provider, it works for us. Plus, this set up is happening all over and it is on the rise, but I can definitely understand both sides of the situation. However, I feel that this should not hold women back when it comes to the qualities and attributes they would like to have. Women should not be intimidated by the words used in the study and instead turn them into positive traits.
What else do I find true regarding this article? Professor Claudia Peus from the Chair of Research and Science Management explained, “A carefully-formulated job posting is essential to get the best choice of personnel" (as cited in Matthews, 2014, para. 4). I agree. I think that employers should be completely honest in job postings of what they are looking for. There’s been too many times where I have applied for a job and during the interview the job was completely not what I had expected based on a posting that was either too vague or extremely inaccurate.

Kim, S. (2013, May 29). Record number of female breadwinners, according to Pew. ABCnews. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Business/record-number-female-primary-breadwinners-show-stark-differences/story?id=19280418

Matthews, N. (2013, April 3). Scary new research says most job listings are designed to repel women. Elle. Retrieved from http://www.elle.com/news/culture/scary-new-research-suggests-job-postings-are-repelling-women-not-men


 


Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Influence of the Media

From the 2004 launch of Facebook during my freshman year in college to my recent Pinterest addiction, it is hard to remember a time before social media. The first thing I do when I wake up is grab my IPhone to check my Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram accounts. Once I get ready, I check my personal emails to prepare myself for the day. At work, I use Salesforce to post news stories, upload important documents, and interact with coworkers. The Salesforce platform resembles Facebook and Twitter; however I still do not get my social media fix while using it so I constantly check my other accounts or answer texts throughout the day. Once I get home, I usually emerge myself into a good Netflix movie or watch Mixed Martial Arts YouTube videos with my fiancĂ©….yes I’m a huge fan. I really enjoy getting out and networking as well, so I also post to LinkedIn and MeetUp. So to keep count, I use around nine or more social media applications a day. Too much?
The negative side to this is that it can take you away from reality. Most of us are digital natives and around fast-paced technology all day. This can cause our attention span to become shorter. I do not remember the last time my friends and I went out for dinner and we did not check in on Facebook or take pictures of our food to post online. In the article, “True Story: I Went Two Weeks without Social Media,” one commentator stated regarding new media, “But after an anniversary weekend away, I realize I’m addicted. It made my hubby mad too, because everywhere we went and everything we did, I had to tag it or Instagram it. I need to get a grip” (as cited in Robison, 2013, para. 11). With the constant sharing and posting of every little detail of our day, sometimes we forget to just slow down and just enjoy the moment with our family and friends. We all have been guilty of this. But to me, social media can be a positive thing.
                               Page, L.,Canivell, A., & Sarnesjo, J. (2010). Unionization and New Media. Retrieved from https://flic.kr/p/8tc4eJ

 I actually received my job through LinkedIn. Also, I like to keep up with my Twitter account for news events. This is extremely convenient for me because all of my news is in one spot and I do not have to go to several different sites online. I can read breaking news from my local station then scroll down and read something from the Huffington Post or Forbes magazine. Without new media, I honestly would not know about any social events happening in my city either. MeetUp is an amazing app to meet people with your same interests. This is not a dating app, but more like a hobby app. For instance, I love health and working out. I have joined about three fitness groups on MeetUp and because of that I get to attend free weekly boot camps and have made lifelong friends that are supportive and have similar fitness goals. Connecting with people who share my same interests that I probably would have never met on my own is an amazing feeling. To me, social media can have this positive impact on many people. Sharing creative recipes through Pinterest, vlogging your trip to Costa Rica or trying to raise money for a good cause on Facebook is what social media is all about and it is incredible. We can be informed about what is happening around the globe instantly. Most importantly, people from around the world are able to socialize and learn about each other’s culture and beliefs.

 Robison, A. (2013). True story: I went two weeks without social media. Independent Fashion Bloggers. Retrieved from http://heartifb.com/2013/01/07/true-story-i-went-two-weeks-without-social-media/